Friday, February 11, 2011

Lady GaGa's Negative Effect on LGBT Community

One of the biggest problems I have with Lady GaGa (other than her pretentious attitude, all of the negative occult imagery and the fact that she copies other artists and then convinces her fans she's original) is that I believe she is leading the gay community down a sinister path of materialism, idolatry, Luciferianism and overall bad taste. She owes the gay community a better message than "don't be a drag, be a queen." After all, it was the gay community who helped bring her into the mainstream. GaGa's latest single, "Born This Way," sends the message that homosexuality can't be changed, because gay people are born gay. I don't have a problem with that. My problem is with the way she has portrayed gay men and women throughout her career. While Britney's new song, "Hold It Against Me" was released on 1/11/2011, GaGa's "Born This Way" was released 2/11/2011. 11 and 22 are of course master numbers, in Masonic numerology.

11 is the most intuitive of all numbers. Intuition is the sixth sense and 6 is the number of man. 11 represents illumination, a channel to the subconscious, insight without rational thought, sensitivity, nervous energy (anxiety), shyness, and impracticality. 11 has all the aspects of 2, enhanced and charged with charisma, leadership, and inspiration. It is a number with inborn duality, which creates dynamism, inner conflict, and other catalyses with its mere presence. 11, when not focused on some goal beyond itself, can be turned inward to create fears and phobias. The number 11 walks the edge between greatness and self-destruction. Its potential for growth, stability, and personal power lies in its acceptance of intuitive understanding, and of spiritual truths. For the 11, such peace (GaGa has the so-called peace symbol/symbol of the broken Jew or cross tattooed on her left wrist) is not found so much in logic, but in faith. 11 is also considered the psychic's number.

22 is considered is the most powerful of all numbers. It is often called the "Master Builder". 22 can turn the most ambitious of dreams into reality. It is potentially the most successful of all numbers. It has many of the inspirational insights of the 11, combined with the practicality and methodology of the 4. 22 is unlimited, yet disciplined. It sees the archetype, and brings it down to Earth in some material form. It has big ideas, great plans, idealism, leadership, and enormous self-confidence. If not practical, the 22 could lead to wasted potential. 22 serves the world in a practical way.

11, 22 and 33 form the triangle/pyramid of enlightenment.


When I first heard GaGa say that she was bisexual, I rolled my eyes because in the past decade, so many young women have followed in the steps of Angelina Jolie and "admitted" to being bisexual or have been seen kissing other women, as if bisexuality or homosexuality is some trend. The problem with that is that it leads ignorant people, who are heterosexual and completely against homosexuality, to continue to believe and preach that homosexuality is wrong and homosexuals can become heterosexuals because sexuality is something that you can change or turn off like a switch.
There is an obvious double standard with sexuality played out in American society. Katy Perry is seen as sexy when she sings some stupid song called "I Kissed A Girl" but no man could ever get away with that. Female sexuality is always heavily exploited but female homosexuality is glamorized to make it acceptable for young men to fantasize about, while male homosexuality is demonized and dehumanized for public humiliation or comedic relief. The video above is from "In Living Color" and it is hilarious but it also negatively portrays gay men, particularly African-American gay men.
Throughout GaGa's career, she has portrayed gay men in the same stereotypical fashion the mainstream media does. Perez Hilton, who clung to GaGa early on, like pubic lice, is one of the loudest, most obnoxious human beings on the blog circuit and just because he is gay, MSNBC wants to know what he thinks of gay marriage, as if he is an expert on marriage or is the spokesman for the entire gay community. The guy doesn't even have a boyfriend and he's been single for years now. Instead of getting someone like Andy Cohen, from Bravo, the media wants to find the most unappealing gay person they can find so that the image and sound of this person stays with the viewer and if they think negatively about this person, that negative opinion will attach itself to whatever subject they are talking about.

The Bible has been edited so many times that we may never know God's final word on sexuality. We don't even know God's real name. The Hebrews called him "Elohim," which is plural and "El" was the name of Saturn, aka Satan. How do we know Satan didn't edit the Holy Bible to make it say that homosexuals should be killed off? If you look throughout history, men have always vilified homosexuals and punished them. Men like Muhammad (who married a 9 year old girl) Hitler, and Fred Phelps but never Christ. Christ taught abstinence as well as tolerance. He didn't teach fear and hate of the unknown or misunderstood.

Harry and Pepper
Male penguins Harry and Pepper were together for six years and raised an abandoned baby chick as their own.

If you look at nature, at other mammals, zoologists will tell you that homosexuality and even bisexuality appears in the animal kingdom. People on a crusade against homosexuality will bring up the fact that pedophilia appears in the animal kingdom as well but homosexuality and pedophilia are not the same thing. We aren't talking about hurting children, we're talking about two consenting adults who are not touching anyone but each other. How does that effect anybody but them? It doesn't. The idea that homosexuality is nature's answer to population control makes people uncomfortable but it makes perfect sense to me.

In Lady GaGa's video for "Alejandro," male soldiers are wearing high heels, further feminizing and emasculating gay men. Then, she appears to be raping one man. Anal sex is associated with homosexuality but what isn't brought up much is the movement within the gay community against anal sex (site not safe for work or under 18). Many gay men believe that anal sex depicts consensual rape and that because the lining of the anus is so sensitive, nothing should be forced into it. Instead, they offer other, safer ways of outercourse, where the penis is never introduced into the body. They also believe that the dominant and submissive states during anal sex, masculate the dominate man but emasculate the submissive man, leading to unequal relationship structures since both men should be treated as equals. I don't know about you, but if some guy tried sticking anything in my ass, I'd blow my rape whistle and punch him in the mouth!
lol
My point of this article wasn't to promote homosexuality, bisexuality or change your mind about what you should or shouldn't believe. I'm just pointing out the obvious; our society treats the LGBT community as a lower class. Society dictates that gay men and women must be grouped together with bisexual men and women and also transgendered men and women, but then keeps the LGBT community separate from heterosexual men and women. Every human being deserves to love and be loved as long as they choose to do so with a consenting adult and no one is being hurt. Stereotypes are good for a quick laugh but when does it stop being funny? The "In Living Color" clip I posted was from the early 90's but not much has changed. There are people who actually believe there is some kind of "gay agenda" being pushed on the world. Some Christian actually told me on Vigilant Citizen's message board once that if gay men were serving in the army, America would be taken over so fast because he believed that gay men can't fight in battle. With the recent repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, hopefully people who think like that idiot will finally wake up from the negative propaganda surrounding the LGBT community. Human sexuality is treated as a duality, but it clearly is not so black and white.

17 comments:

  1. This is a fantastic article. You brought up so many good points. I hope that people will be able to read what you've shared and just let it marinate without judging too fast. I'm sure you've noticed that many people that read these blogs and sites can be very narrow minded in their views. Great article.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ok hun look thank you for this great artical but FYI our prophet didnt marry miss aisha when she was 6 ok so please keep the honorable name of mohammed صلى الله عليه و سلم - out of your blog k?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm sorry Angelic_Rasha, she was 9 when he raped her, not 6. Honorable indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. lol. what's missed by readers of blogs such as this one and MK Culture is the fact that 99.5% of everything you write is based on conjecture and biased opinion--not gospel or fact.

    by the way check out the series 'Spartacus' which is on starz. you can see free here:

    http://www.alluc.org/tv-shows/watch-spartacus-blood-and-sand-online/season-01/195505.html?navpath=search%7Cspartacus%7C1


    Gay sexuality is portrayed without the taboo nature you wrote of. Definitely one of the best shows on tv, not for the gay portrayals, but because the cast is awesome. i don't have cable and happened to find the show online. Spartacus and Carnivale are two of the most entertaining shows ever written.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ToniLen, this post is obviously social commentary. I don't see how one could read this post and come to the conclusion that the author is presenting his words as the gospel. I view this post as an astute glimpse into the pop culture iconography of one of today's biggest stars. When the media discusses Lady GaGa and the gay community they praise her dedication. What is rarely discussed is the fact that the portrayals Lady GaGa and her handlers showcase do not represent the entire gay community. Lady GaGa reinforces many of the stereotypes homosexual men face on a day to day basis. Her team panders to the community and takes advantage of their deep rooted longing for acceptance. I for one find it refreshing that these issues are being addressed here as opposed the usual knee-jerk "good for her, she loves gay people" reaction. The gay community needs to stop looking for approval from pop divas who pander to them and focus on ways to advance the community from within. Lady GaGa is fighting battles Madonna already won in the 90's and turning it into a mockery and marketing tool in the process.

    As far as my blog being 99.5% biased opinion, I'd LOVE for you to point out which posts those are. When I post about symbolism the information is 100% accurate. I do not give opinions and I allow the reader to come to their own conclusions, but the information regarding the symbolism is 100% accurate. Monarch programming is a completely different story. We will NEVER be able to supply proof and facts because the truth has been hidden. What I do know is I get hundreds of letters thanking me for the research that I do and acknowledging that the information is factual. While you sit there with a cynical attitude watching Starz shows online, MILLIONS of children are going through the very things that we describe. I'm not waiting for the government to acknowledge what is going on before I bring awareness to the issues. There were people like you who laughed out loud about MKUltra but when those documents were released they didn't have very much to say. At the end of the day if you don't understand or believe you do not have to read.

    ReplyDelete
  6. ToniLen, the FACT that you believe all gospel is fact just proves that you are on the wrong blogs. What proof do you have that 99.5% of what I put on my blog or what he puts on his blog are "biased opinions?" Did you even research the articles you are accusing of being "conjecture?" No, you made a biased judgment and then compared said articles to gospel without doing any work to back up your claims. I hate to be the one to tell you that not all gospel or scripture is truth. While I maintain that this is not a religious blog, nor do I enforce any religion agenda on my readers, I do often include passages from scripture in the Holy Bible in my articles. I also provide numerous links in each article to my sources and I always provide the names of the authors and texts I get my information from, which many blogs do not. Please elaborate on what you found to be "99.5% biased opinion" and I will gladly look into it and provide my sources. If you bothered to actually take the time to really read this article, you will have already been aware that I provided a link to a web site where positive homosexual relationship practices are expressed, in similar fashion of the Greeks--and I do mean, the historical Greeks, not some glamorized depiction of them on some television show.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @MK, my you're defensive aren't you? Bitch, I've researched MK Ultra/mind control programming and probably know more about it than you do, as I have family working for the CIA and DIA and I've known about mind control programs for atleast 15 years; when I was just graduating highschool. Programs of the sort still exist, but you only tangentially make the connections on your blog.

    When you post about symbolism you're not 100% accurate as you fail to mention that those symbols have no power, other than the psychological power you invest. I haven't visited your blog in months, so I can't speak on anything you've written recently. However your past posts were largely conjecture, mixed with whatever you gleaned from other writer's research.

    @Blinding--i had to correct you several months ago when you stated that Britany Spears father raped/molested her--when there is no evidence to suggest your claims.

    by the way 'gospel' is a figure of speech, as I'm not even a Christian--so you haven't told me anything. When did I mention religion? I was using the word 'gospel' generally, pardon me for going over your head.

    I don't give 2 shits about any of these pop stars, but I do find your pseudo-intellectual ramblings amusing-- your interpretation of occult symbolism is supposedly 'bad' simply because you say so. You haven't a clue what you're talking about and it's painfully obvious. You are hardly the only blog discussing pop culture 'dystopia,' so spare me your sanctimony because nothing you or MK write is original.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I fail to mention that the symbols have no power? How do you explain the following posts?

    http://mkculture.blogspot.com/2010/01/dimensions-of-dance.html

    http://mkculture.blogspot.com/2010/11/point-of-view.html

    I have went into details numerous times on how we are in the drivers seat and the power of the symbolism is based on our interpretation. You seem to be the type who will read a post or two and judge the entire blog based on your ignorance.

    ReplyDelete
  9. ToniLen, you act as if you were doing me some huge favor by pointing out the obvious fact that there was no police report of Britney's sexual abuse. You claim you know more than us but its clear you don't. If you did actually bother to do the research you would know that we did not pull these themes or ideas out of a hat, since they are repetitive themes with mind control victims. You are obviously an ignorant, bitter, childish person jealous that we have hundreds or daily readers when no one gives a shit what you think. You point out how unoriginal we are but we have never claimed to be original. I include links to the left of influential blogs. It appears you are about to start a similar blog so you are a hypocrite. It's pathetic that you can't find your own audience but instead have to leave immature comments on the blogs of others just to get attention. No one forces you to read our blogs yet you took the time to create an account just to be able to criticize our well researched work. Get a life and we will get back to our's, ignoring you like the rest of the (male) population.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Blinding--i've had this gmail account for over 6-7 years, so clearly you need to stop making things up. And the blog I may or may not start is about NWO/ politics and has nothing to do with mind control topics. I put it up long before I commented on your blog, so once again you haven't a clue what you're talking about.

    Why would I need an 'audience' when I'm not promoting anything? I'm simply expressing my opinion on your blog and you obviously must care about my opinion or why are you commenting.
    Did you really just mention immaturity then type that last sentence? You're a straight up fool.

    MK,

    Hmm, you say "we're in the drivers seat," yet in other posts you opine about how dangerous the symbols are. you're typing out of both sides of your neck.

    ReplyDelete
  11. And by the way, why on earth would I be "jealous" that you have readers? I just caught that sentence. I'm not in competition with you. You seriously sound crazy. It's a pity those "hundreds" of readers never bother to comment.

    I prefer to write screenplays and make films rather than blogging which is why I haven't pursued my own blog.

    Anyway, I don't feel like being catty, so I'll bid adieu.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Which one of my posts do I say the symbols are dangerous? I explore subjects and let the reader decide for themselves. I think you're just making things up at this point and you're clearly not a regular reader of my blog.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I wasn't talking about your gmail account, I was talking about you signing into blogger with it in November. You are pathetic. There's always some lame comeback from you. Why would I try to lie about your email account when I can only see your blogger profile? I hope you're wearing a helmet and mittens. Go sit down before you hurt your brain from all that thinking, Captain Obvious. You want to point out how unoriginal my and MK Culture's blogs are yet you are starting a New World Order/political blog? Yeah, cause mind control and politics aren't related...and because I've never mentioned the New World Order on my blog before. It's so obvious you don't know shit which is why you're so bitter that we have people who read our blogs daily. You say you feel sorry for them yet you keep coming back to point out the obvious, just so you have an audience. You are what internet etiquette refers to as a "troll." But you already knew that because you know more than us, right? Even the name of your blog is unoriginal and uninspired.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why is "femininity", so demeaned, mocked, and hated?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Please do one about Cyndi Lauper.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Please do one about Cyndi Lauper.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Did you realize there's a 12 word sentence you can say to your partner... that will trigger deep emotions of love and impulsive attractiveness for you deep inside his chest?

    That's because hidden in these 12 words is a "secret signal" that fuels a man's instinct to love, look after and protect you with his entire heart...

    12 Words Who Trigger A Man's Desire Instinct

    This instinct is so hardwired into a man's mind that it will drive him to work harder than before to build your relationship stronger.

    Matter of fact, triggering this powerful instinct is so binding to getting the best ever relationship with your man that as soon as you send your man one of these "Secret Signals"...

    ...You'll instantly find him expose his soul and mind for you in such a way he haven't experienced before and he'll perceive you as the only woman in the universe who has ever truly attracted him.

    ReplyDelete